|
|
|
题名
|
作者
|
年代
|
出处
|
被引量
|
| 1 | Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis:a multicenter study显示文摘 | Akbarnia BA Marks DS Oheneba BA | 2005 | Spine2005，30，17： | 1 |
| 2 | Thromboembolic Disease After Combined Anterior/Posterior Reconstruction for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective Cohort Study Using Magnetic Resonance Venography显示文摘 | Dana P. Piasecki Ashley R. Poynton Douglas N. Mintz Jeffrey S. Roh Margaret G. E. Peterson Bernard A. Rawlins Gina Charles Oheneba Boachie-Adjei | 2008 | Spine2008，，6： | 1 |
| 3 | Surgical treatment of abolescent idiopathic scoliosis:A comparative study of two segmental instrumentation systems 显示文摘 | Federico p Girardi Oheneba Boachie-Adjei et ai | 2001 | Journal Disorders2001，14，1： | 1 |
| 4 | In- cidence,risk factors,and natural course of proximal junc- tional kyphosis:surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis,minimum 5 years of follow-up显示文摘 | Mitsuru Yagi Akilah B King Oheneba Boachie-Adjei | 1976 | Spine(Phila Pa 1976)1976，37，： | 1 |
| 5 | Noggin regulation of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) 2/7 heterodimer activity in vitro显示文摘 | Wei Zhu Jaehon Kim Christina Cheng Bernard A. Rawlins Oheneba Boachie-Adjei Ronald G. Crystal Chisa Hidaka | 2006 | Bone2006，，1： | 1 |
| 6 | Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early onset seoliosis : a muhicenter study 显示文摘 | Akbamia BA Marks DS Oheneba BA | 2005 | Spine2005，17，： | 1 |
| 7 | Multiple vertebral osteotomies in the treatment of rigid adult spine deformities显示文摘 | Voos K Boachie A Oheneba D | 2001 | Spine2001，26，5： | 1 |
| 8 | Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality of Adult Scoliosis Surgery显示文摘 | Charles A. Sansur Justin S. Smith Jeff D. Coe Steven D. Glassman Sigurd H. Berven David W. Polly Joseph H. Perra Oheneba Boachie-Adjei Christopher I. Shaffrey | 2011 | Spine2011，，9： | 1 |
| 9 | Rates of Infection After Spine Surgery Based on 108,419 Procedures: A Report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee显示文摘 | Justin S. Smith Christopher I. Shaffrey Charles A. Sansur Sigurd H. Berven Kai-Ming G. Fu Paul A. Broadstone Theodore J. Choma Michael J. Goytan Hilali H. Noordeen Dennis R. Knapp Robert A. Hart William F. Donaldson David W. Polly Joseph H. Perra Oheneba | 2011 | Spine2011，，7： | 1 |
| 10 | Comparison of complications and clinical outcomes between extreme lateral/posterior and open anterior/posterior approaches in the treatment of adult scoliosis显示文摘Objectives To determine the differences of clinical outcome and complications between combined extreme lateral/posterior(X/P)approach and open anterior/posterior(A/P)approach for treatment of adult scoliosis.Methods Twelve patients who had X/P fusion for primary adult scoliosis were matched with a cohort of 18 patients who underwent A/P treatment.Open anterior fusion was performed via a thoracotomy/thoracoabdominal approach,and extreme lateral interbody fusion(XLIF)was performed using an expandable tubular retractor through a transpsoas access to the target disc space.All of the patients were followed up at least 2 years.Operating time,estimate blood loss(EBL)and transfusion volume were noted,radiographic parameters were evaluated before surgery and at final follow-up,and Scoliosis Research Society(SRS)-22 score,Oswestry disability index(ODI)as well as complications were recorded.Results There were no significant differences between two groups for age,gender,diagnosis,preoperative curve magnitudes and fusion levels.EBL was statistically less in X/P than A/P group(2 304 vs 3 176 mL,P=0.04),and there was a trend toward shorter surgical time(493 vs 528 min,P=0.057).Postoperative radiographic coronal correction were almost the same between two groups.There were 14 complications including 4 perioperative and 10 late in X/P group,comparing to A/P group with 11 perioperative and 12 late complications,which showed no significant differences between two groups(P>0.05).Wound infection was found in 3 A/P patients while no X/P patients was infected(P=0.26).Early revision surgery was performed in 0 X/P patients and 3 A/P patients without significant difference(P=0.26).Pseudarthrosis rates found in X/P versus A/P group(3/12 vs 1/18)were not significantly different(P=0.27).The occurrence rate of proximal junctional kyphosis(PJK)was the same(5/12 vs 7/18)in two groups.SRS-22 score and ODI in two groups reflected a similar patient assessment before surgery,and improvement at the last follow-up.Conclusions Combined X/P approach surgery in the treatment of adult scoliosis can achieve similar significant coronal correction to A/P surgery with decreased EBL,and a tendency of shorter surgical time.It also presented a declining trend in the rates of perioperative complications,wound infection and requirement for early reoperation.There was a tendency of higher lumbosacral pseudarthrosis rate in X/P group.Late complications and clinical outcomes were similar at over 2-year follow-up. | Honglei YI Jiawei LIAO Oheneba Boachie-Adjei Zenghui WU Hong XIA | 2017 | 中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志2017，9，6： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员