| 4 | Utility of multi-detector row computed tomography angiography versus Doppler in localization of perforators of anterolateral thigh flaps显示文摘Aim:Anterolateral thigh(ALT)flap is widely used in reconstruction of various defects.Preoperative imaging facilitates perforator mapping,overcoming intraoperative uncertainty.The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of multi-detector row computed tomography angiography(MDCTA)and a handheld Doppler in locating ALT perforators.Methods:Twenty patients were randomized into two groups.Group 1 patients received MDCTA and Doppler studies whereas Group 2 received only a Doppler study.The number,location,course,and source of all cutaneous and sizable perforators were compared with intraoperative findings.Surgeons’stress levels during flap harvest and flap harvest time were compared.Results:MDCTA findings correlated well with intraoperative findings for perforator type and segmental distribution with 100%concordance.Doppler alone had a 52%rate of concordance.The sensitivity and specificity for MDCTA in demonstrating the presence of perforators were 85.71%and 97.22%,respectively;whereas for Doppler alone the sensitivity and specificity were 80%and 87.91%,respectively.In demonstrating perforator source,MDCTA showed a sensitivity of 100%and specificity of 91.66%,with 100%accuracy.Sensitivity and specificity for sizable perforators were 90%each,with 88.88%accuracy.Doppler studies were unable to provide this information.Comparison of surgeon stress levels showed no differences between the two groups,although the time for flap harvest was significantly shorter in Group 1.Conclusion:MDCTA compared to Doppler is more sensitive,specific,and accurate with respect to location,course,and source of perforators. | Chandan N.Jadhav Surinder Singh Makkar Gautam Biswas Niranjan Khandelwal | 2016 | Plastic and Aesthetic Research2016，3，1： | 0 |
您所在的机构暂未开通此部分的功能，请联系管理员